CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

roku

App dashboard with purple-themed aesthetic, top-bar navigation, card-based layouts, and developer-first workflows.

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/roku/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill that gives Claude everything needed to author Roku design-system guidelines: foundations, a sequenced workflow, required output structure, and quality gates. It assumes Claude's competence without padding and stays self-contained.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (tokens, rules, quality gates, constraint language) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

It gives concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: a numbered authoring workflow, an explicit required output structure, a concrete required-states list ("default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error"), and "must"/"should" constraint language.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Guideline Authoring Workflow is a clearly sequenced 6-step process backed by Quality Gates; since this involves no destructive or batch operation, no validation feedback loop is required.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is self-contained and organized into clear, navigable sections with no need for external reference files, which the rubric rewards with a 3 for well-organized single-file instruction skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

35%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description reads as a product feature blurb rather than a skill capability statement: it describes what the dashboard looks like but not what the skill does or when to use it. It has no trigger terms and no "Use when" guidance.

Suggestions

Reframe the description around the skill's actions in third person, e.g. 'Authors implementation-ready Roku design-system guidelines: tokens, component rules, and accessibility criteria.'

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when creating or updating Roku app-dashboard design guidelines, component rules, or design tokens.'

Surface natural trigger terms users would actually say ('design system', 'component guidelines', 'design tokens') rather than describing the dashboard aesthetic.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ("App dashboard") and concrete attributes ("purple-themed aesthetic", "top-bar navigation", "card-based layouts") but lists no actions the skill performs, so it sits above the vague score-1 examples yet below a comprehensive score-3 listing of specific actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

It conveys a recognizable "what" (a Roku app-dashboard design-system skill) but the "when" is entirely missing with no "Use when..." trigger clause, which the guidelines cap at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like "purple-themed aesthetic", "top-bar navigation", and "developer-first workflows" describe the artifact rather than the natural terms a user would say to invoke this skill, and there are no common keyword variations.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The aesthetic-and-navigation combo is somewhat specific, but the generic design-system framing could still overlap with other UI/dashboard design skills, so it is not a clearly distinct niche.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
bergside/awesome-design-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.