Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, token-efficient instruction set with concrete design tokens and a clear authoring workflow, but it would be more actionable with a worked example and more robust with an explicit validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bullet-list with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, though 'Rules', 'Expected Behavior', 'Quality Gates', and 'Example Constraint Language' overlap slightly. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete tokens (hex values, font weights, 8pt grid), an explicit output structure, and a list of required states, but provides no worked example of a finished guideline to model output against, leaving the guidance somewhat incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step 'Guideline Authoring Workflow' is clearly sequenced and backed by 'Quality Gates', but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop and the checkpoints are implicit rather than enforced per step. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is self-contained in one well-sectioned file with no nested or multi-level references; for a compact single-file skill this organization is appropriate and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |