Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete tokens, an explicit workflow, and a QA checkpoint. Its main gap is the absence of worked component examples to make guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Add one or two worked component-rule examples (e.g., a sample button anatomy with default/hover/focus-visible/active states mapped to tokens) to lift actionability toward anchor 3.
Trim the exhaustive font-weight enumeration ("100, 200, ... 900") to the weights actually used, removing token-cost padding.
Consider moving the full token table and component-state matrix into a references file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, list-driven, and assumes competence with no concept-explanation filler; the only minor wart (enumerated font weights) is data rather than prose padding, fitting anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists (hex tokens, named fonts, explicit state list, 6-step workflow, required output structure) but no worked examples or copy-paste-ready samples, fitting anchor 2's "concrete but incomplete" rather than anchor 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step Guideline Authoring Workflow with explicit sequencing and a QA checklist / Quality Gates checkpoint; guidance authoring is not a fragile batch/destructive operation requiring a validate-retry loop, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file (~75 lines) with no bundle files and clean, well-labeled sections; no nested references or monolithic wall, so well-organized sections satisfy anchor 3 for a no-bundle skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |