CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

research

Research an engineering question well enough to support a decision: check a claim against primary sources, compare technologies or approaches, test whether an approach will work or scale, or find why something performs badly, using the repository, current documentation and small, reproducible experiments. Ends with a recommendation that names its evidence, tradeoffs and remaining uncertainty, which may be to keep what exists. Use it whenever the user asks whether to adopt, replace, upgrade or remove a dependency, technology or design, which option to choose, whether a switch is safe, or whether an approach will work or scale, even if they never say research, and whenever they ask to research, compare, evaluate or prototype. Not for quick lookups that one source answers, or for carrying out a change already decided.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security
Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

The workflow instructs the agent to research engineering questions using web searches and reading web pages, issue threads, and package metadata, which exposes it to outsider-authored free text.

Report incorrect finding
Repository

bezmoradi/knackpack

Path

skills/research/SKILL.md

Audited
Security analysis
Snyk

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.