Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally lean and actionable instruction-only skill: exact commands, explicit exit-code and validation semantics, and well-integrated one-level-deep references. The only structural improvement is moving the ranking internals and response-contract fine print into the existing reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is composed almost entirely of terse imperative directives with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — no 'what a registry is' or library tutorials — so every token earns its place per the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready launcher commands for bash and PowerShell with exact flags, concrete follow-up subcommands (page/inspect/explain/details, sources list/enable/disable, packs), and explicit exit codes (0/2/3/4) cover the common cases fully, matching the 'fully executable' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The search workflow (steps 1–8) and install workflow (steps 1–5) are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: prerequisite check before run, inspect-before-install, explicit approval immediately before executing, and exit-code-driven error handling ('On prerequisite failure (exit 4), show the concise error and stop'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The three reference files (configuration.md, result-schema.md, architecture.md) exist, are linked one level deep, and are clearly signaled with their purpose. It falls short of 5 because dense inlined material — the 70/20/10 ranking formula and the footer/link contract rules — reads like reference content that could be split out of the overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |