Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable scaffold document with an explicit, validated multi-step workflow and copy-paste commands throughout. The two weaker dimensions are conciseness (repeated risk disclaimers) and progressive disclosure (a large monolith that could split detailed reference tables into separate files).
Suggestions
Consolidate the risk framing: the 'Read this first' callout, the guardrails 'suggested not safety' prose, the Known limitations table, and the final Disclaimer restate the same points — fold them into one authoritative risk section and reference it, to trim repeated tokens.
Move the detailed capability-map tables and the 'Platform behavior notes' (cli-check return semantics, address casing, latency methodology) into a references/ file (e.g. references/capabilities.md), keeping SKILL.md a lean overview that links out — this would lift progressive_disclosure toward 5.
The event-schema nullability table and notes 1–5 are reference material used only when writing hooks; consider extracting them to references/event-schema.md and citing from the 'Strategy hooks' section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The operational core (capability map, event schema, assembly, configuration, pre-flight, running) is dense and lean with no basic-concept padding, but the risk framing is restated three-to-four times ("Read this first" callout, guardrails "suggested not safety" prose, Known limitations, and the final Disclaimer) — those are the trims that would tighten it. Not a 3 because the unique operational content earns its tokens; not a 5 because the repeated disclaimer language is over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact CLI commands ("baw leaderboard query", "baw tracker ws --address-list <file> -c <chain>", "python3 copytrader.py"), exact config keys with meanings, the full copy-paste scoring script, concrete JSON shapes, and named error codes ("1001001", "1001002"). Covers the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step "Getting started" workflow is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints — step 6's plumbing checklist (sources/policy match, events.jsonl decision distribution, conn_seq not climbing, deployed stays 0), the pre-flight probe block, and the live-acknowledgement gate that refuses to start. Feedback loops are present ("Change hooks → re-run → score again"; iterate before concluding), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement that would otherwise cap at 3. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned with clear headers and explicit cross-references, and the one bundle file ("scripts/copytrader.py") is correctly disclosed ("edit the three functions ... at the top of scripts/copytrader.py"). Not a 5 because the ~820-line SKILL.md inlines reference-style material (capability tables, platform-behavior notes, full event-schema detail) that could be split into references/ files to keep the overview lean; not a 3 because what is present is well-organized and clearly navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |