Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean orchestrator: a clear five-step workflow with verification, hard constraints, and a well-structured one-level-deep reference containing the implementation checklist and troubleshooting. Its main gap is that neither the body nor its reference contains a single concrete artifact (BOM snippet, config keys, or a minimal service example), leaving the exact output shape implicit.
Suggestions
Include one minimal inline example (e.g., a wx-java-bom dependency-management snippet or a two-line Service/config skeleton) so the expected output shape for "依赖与配置" and "最小调用" is concrete.
Surface the reference file's most critical checkpoints directly in the body's step list (e.g., "回调先校验消息合法性，支付回调按商户单号幂等") so validation does not depend on the agent reading the reference unprompted.
Add an explicit order-first verification instruction in step 1 (e.g., which low-risk API call to start with), mirroring the reference's "先完成一条只读或低风险 API 调用" rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~14-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what WeChat/WxJava is or how the SDK works, and every sentence directs behavior (e.g., "先输出依赖与配置，再输出最小调用", "凭据一律用占位符"). This matches the level-5 anchor where every token earns its place; level 4 would require minor instances of over-explanation, which are absent. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is directive and specific — ordered output ("先输出依赖与配置，再输出最小调用；每段示例注明应放置的位置和所依赖的模块"), credential placeholders, and required local verification steps — but no concrete snippet, command, or config-key example appears in the body itself; all specifics are delegated to the reference and external SDK docs. As an instruction-only skill the guidance is actionable, yet it stops short of the fully copy-paste-ready specificity of the level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps form a clear sequence (confirm requirements → read constraints → output deps/config → output minimal code → verification and safety warnings), and step 5 ("给出本地验证步骤与安全提醒") plus the reference's checklist and NPE troubleshooting provide validation and error-recovery checkpoints. It fits level 4 rather than 5 because the explicit feedback loops (e.g., 空 key/NPE → 核对启动模块、profile、配置前缀) live in the referenced file rather than in the body's own sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview that appropriately delegates detailed constraints to a well-signaled, one-level-deep reference ([接入约束](references/integration.md), which exists in the bundle), and no constraint detail is inlined that belongs in a separate file. This matches the level-5 anchor of a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |