Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill: lean body, concrete workflow with validation and rollback conditions, and proper delegation of detail to an existing one-level reference. The only gaps are the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop and of any concrete commands in the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Eight lean lines of pure instruction with zero concept explanation and no padding — every clause directs action, matching the anchor-5 example of assuming Claude's competence; no neighboring anchor fits better since nothing is trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Specific instruction-only guidance — exact items to collect (依赖树、代理配置、关键调用路径), named change-type branches, and a defined output shape — with concrete commands delegated to the referenced migration.md; per the code-vs-instruction note the missing code is acceptable, leaving only minor gaps (anchor 4, not 5, and above anchor 3 since steps are complete rather than high-level hints). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 5-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (编译、关键回归测试、灰度、明确回滚条件) and a referenced checklist, but the body lacks an explicit on-failure feedback loop — anchor 4 rather than 5; not anchor 3 since checkpoints are explicit and the no-validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/migration.md, verified to exist) that carries the detail — matching the simple-skill guidance and anchor 5; migration.md's links point to external GitHub docs, not nested bundle references, so no depth penalty applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |