Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplar instruction skill: lean, concrete, and well-structured, with BAD/GOOD patterns, a deletion test, and a closing self-check validation loop. It assumes competence and routes external depth to one-level-deep references rather than inlining it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Assumes Claude's competence throughout — no explanation of what comments, Rust, or rustdoc are — and every section (Reader, Three Kinds, Deletion Test, Banned Patterns, Region Comments, Self-Check) earns its place; the Diátaxis framework is linked rather than retold. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete BAD/GOOD code pairs for each banned pattern, an explicit Deletion Test, and precise region-comment rules give copy-ready, executable guidance rather than abstraction; the instruction-only guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Self-Check Before Finishing' section is an explicit validation checkpoint (re-read only the comments in the diff, apply three checks, fix or delete what fails) — a clear feedback loop for the destructive act of editing/deleting comments. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (Diátaxis, the lint-rule-development skill, and the workspace.rs exemplar); no nested-reference chains and no bundle files needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |