Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, actionable workflow with strong validation checkpoints, held back by some redundancy and a monolithic inline structure that references a checklist.md file not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the Minor/Moderate/Major scope classification — define it once and reference it from both Step 4 Section 5 and Step 5 to tighten conciseness.
Move the activation/config-loading preamble and path conventions into a separate referenced file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, improving progressive disclosure.
Ensure checklist.md is actually bundled (or inline its key sections) so the Step 2 reference resolves to a real file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient procedural detail specific to the bmad framework, but it carries redundancy — the Minor/Moderate/Major scope classification is described in both Step 4 Section 5 and again in Step 5 — and some config/language instructions are restated, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides executable commands (the resolve_customization.py invocations), a concrete input-file table with load strategies, an explicit output path, and a copy-paste-ready old→new story edit example with rationale. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps are clearly sequenced with explicit HALT validation checkpoints, approval/revise feedback loops, and goto re-entry points (Step 5 revisits Steps 3/4), giving clear validation and error-recovery paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It signals a one-level-deep reference to checklist.md, but no bundle files exist in references/scripts/assets to verify it, and the body itself is a ~295-line monolithic inline <workflow> block with config-loading and path conventions that could be split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |