Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with proper validation checkpoints, but it is verbose in places and bundles a large inline workflow while referencing bundle files that are not actually present.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated auto-discover parsing block in step 1 and tone down hortatory emphasis ('EXHAUSTIVE ANALYSIS REQUIRED!', 'do NOT be lazy') to tighten conciseness.
Provide the referenced bundle files (`discover-inputs.md`, `checklist.md`, template.md) or replace bare-path references with inline content so the skill is self-contained.
Extract the large inline <workflow> XML into a referenced workflow file to better separate overview from detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly actionable but padded with hortatory emphasis ('EXHAUSTIVE ANALYSIS REQUIRED!', 'do NOT be lazy or skim!') and a near-duplicate auto-discover block in step 1 that repeats the same parsing logic twice, so tokens do not all earn their place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (`python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py ...`), specific path patterns, and copy-paste-ready instructions throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (step 6 validates against `./checklist.md`, verifies prior 'backlog' status before transitioning) and HALT/error-recovery branches. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections and one-level references are signaled (e.g. `./discover-inputs.md`, `./checklist.md`, template.md), but the bundle directories and referenced files do not exist in the skill, and the large inline XML workflow makes it closer to a monolithic structure than a clean overview-plus-references split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |