Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The shim body is well-structured and actionably guides Claude through a four-step forwarding workflow with concrete commands and exact handoff context. Its main weakness is a verbose inline deprecation notice and restated field lists that could be tightened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the inline deprecation notice enumerates all new customization fields and the legacy-field list is restated, which could be trimmed or moved to a reference. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete executable command (`uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py ...`), specific file paths, and exact context to pass; the final skill-to-skill handoff is described as passing context rather than a literal command, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered activation steps are clearly sequenced (resolve customization, load config, emit notice, invoke bmad-prd); no validation checkpoints are present, but as a non-destructive forwarding shim the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At 26 lines with no need for external references, the single well-organized "On Activation" section meets the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |