Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable forwarding shim with a clear activation sequence and clean progressive disclosure, weakened mainly by a verbose, repetitive deprecation notice that inflates the token budget.
Suggestions
Tighten the deprecation notice: state the migration once and reference the field list in a single compact line rather than repeating it across the notice and the forwarding context.
Add a brief validation/confirmation step (e.g. confirm the forwarded intent was accepted by bmad-prd) to strengthen the workflow checkpoint.
Consider moving the lengthy field enumeration into a short reference table so the inline body stays lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The deprecation notice block is heavily padded, repeating the full list of customization fields twice and the migration instruction in a verbose sentence; the forwarding contract could be stated far more tersely. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete executable commands (the resolve_customization.py invocation, loading specific config.yaml paths) and an explicit, structured contract for invoking bmad-prd with pre-resolved legacy fields, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The activation sequence is clearly numbered (resolve customization → load config → emit notice → forward to bmad-prd) with an explicit terminal 'Do not execute any further steps' checkpoint; it lacks a validation/error-handling loop but the task is a non-destructive forward, so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with a clear header, a numbered 'On Activation' section, and a single-level forward reference to bmad-prd; no nested/deep references are introduced and the shim stays appropriately thin. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |