CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bmad-editorial-review

Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review.

48

Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Merged into bmad-review. Invoke the bmad-review skill on the same content with the structure and prose lenses — both, structure first, so prose runs on top of the structure findings — unless the caller asked for a structure-only or prose-only review, in which case pass only that lens. Pass through any also_consider areas, and forward this skill's resolved [workflow] fields as pre-resolved values — but only those that resolved to something, since an empty value here means no legacy override exists and bmad-review's own default should stand: reader_type, style_guide, review_guidance, output_preferences, persistent_facts, activation_steps_prepend, activation_steps_append, on_complete, and review_output_path as the report path. Present the findings in the legacy shape: the two-pass findings table | Pass | Original Text | Revised Text | Changes | with the purpose/audience read above it and, when the structure pass ran, the reduction summary below it — and no other lens's output.

Repository
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.