CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bmad-editorial-review-prose

Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review-prose/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, fully actionable redirect instruction that specifies the exact lens, passthrough, output format, and no-issues fallback. It is well-structured for a minimal single-purpose shim with no need for external references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

A single lean paragraph that assumes Claude's competence and states only the redirect, lens constraint, passthrough, and exact output format with no padding.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: names the exact skill to invoke, the prose lens, what to pass through, the three-column table shape, explicit negatives, and the exact no-issues fallback string.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A single-action redirect skill whose one action (invoke bmad-review with the prose lens, then present the legacy table or emit the fallback) is unambiguous and fully sequenced.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed; the focused single paragraph is well-organized and right-sized for a shim.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

21%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a minimal redirect stub that names its target but provides no natural trigger terms or a "Use when..." clause. It is distinguishable as a deprecated shim yet carries inherent overlap with bmad-review.

Suggestions

Add a "Use when..." clause with the natural trigger phrases (e.g., editorial prose review) so activation is explicit.

Include 1-2 concrete capabilities the prose lens performs (e.g., flag passive voice, tighten wordy phrasing) to raise specificity.

Reframe in third-person capability voice (e.g., "Reviews prose for editorial issues") rather than only stating it forwards to another skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the target domain ("bmad-review") and one action ("forwards to"), but the action is a minimal redirect rather than a concrete capability of the skill itself.

2 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is a vague redirect and there is no "when"/"Use when..." clause, which the guidelines cap at the low end of completeness.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains only meta/technical terms ("Deprecated", "forwards", "bmad-review") and no natural phrases a user would say to need this skill.

1 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It is clearly labeled as a deprecated forwarder to a named skill, but by design it overlaps structurally with the very skill it forwards to.

3 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.