CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bmad-editorial-review-structure

Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review.

48

Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/core-skills/v6-shims/bmad-editorial-review-structure/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Merged into bmad-review. Invoke the bmad-review skill on the same content with only the structure lens, passing through the same inputs and any also_consider areas. Present the findings in the legacy report shape: a ## Document Summary block (purpose, audience, reader type, structure model, current length), a ## Recommendations list of numbered [CUT/MERGE/MOVE/CONDENSE/QUESTION/PRESERVE] entries each with rationale and word impact, and a closing ## Summary (total recommendations, estimated reduction) — not the findings table. If no structural issues are found, output exactly: No substantive changes recommended.

Repository
bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.