Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, well-specified forwarding contract with concrete actionable steps and a clear sequence, slightly let down by a lack of section structure and a few parenthetical explanations that could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense forwarding logic where nearly every clause carries necessary specification (lens ordering, field pass-through rules, output table shape); only minor explanatory asides like the empty-value rationale could be trimmed, fitting 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — invoke bmad-review with named lenses, forward a named list of fields, emit a specific '| Pass | Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |' table — with only minor gaps like exact invocation syntax, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (structure then prose, pass fields, present legacy-shaped findings) with explicit conditionals for single-lens cases; this forwarding task is non-destructive so no validation checkpoint is required, fitting 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a short under-50-line shim with no external references needed, it is self-contained and appropriately scoped; it loses a point only because the guidance sits in a single un-sectioned paragraph rather than well-organized sections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |