Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, instruction-only skill with concrete commands, an exact CSV schema, and explicit completion-detection guardrails. It is tight and actionable, with only minor room to tighten wording and to formalize the validation feedback loop into an ordered checklist.
Suggestions
Tighten the Desired Outcomes list — several bullets restate the same orientation idea and could be consolidated to reduce tokens.
Promote the completion-detection rules into an explicit ordered checklist (detect → inspect artifact → if uncertain, ask user) so the validation feedback loop is a clear workflow rather than prose.
If the skill grows, move the CSV column-by-column interpretation into a one-level-deep reference file so the overview stays lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and sectioned (Purpose, Desired Outcomes, Data Sources, CSV Interpretation, Response Format, Constraints) without explaining concepts Claude already knows, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'; not a 5 because a few bullets (e.g., the desired-outcomes list) could be tightened without losing meaning. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes concrete executable guidance: 'Run uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_config.py --project-root {project-root}', an exact CSV header line, and a precise response format template — mostly executable guidance; not a 5 because completion-detection and recommendation logic are described as rules rather than a fully copy-paste-ready procedure. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear sequence (data sources → CSV interpretation → completion detection → response format) with an explicit checkpoint: 'When completion cannot be determined reliably, say so and ask the user; do not recommend advancing based on file presence alone'; not a 5 because the validation/feedback loop is described narratively rather than as an ordered validate→fix→retry checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections with explicit external file paths, matching 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'; not a 5 because at ~70 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception and remains a single monolithic file rather than splitting detail into one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |