Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable navigation skill with concrete paths, commands, and format examples, and clean progressive disclosure. The main weaknesses are minor verbosity in the Purpose/constraint lines and an implicit rather than explicitly numbered workflow with no validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Replace the implicit section-based flow with an explicit ordered procedure (e.g., 1. Resolve config, 2. Load catalog, 3. Detect completion, 4. Pick next step, 5. Format response) so the workflow is unambiguous.
Tighten the Purpose sentence and rewrite the final Constraints bullet ('If the active module is ambiguous...') into a clear, concise instruction.
Add a light validation checkpoint (e.g., confirm the catalog CSV exists and the config resolver returned JSON before proceeding) to make the read-only flow more robust.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining known concepts, but the Purpose line and the final Constraints bullet ('retrieve all meta rows remote sources to find relevant info also to help answer their question') are wordy and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete executable guidance: exact catalog/config paths, an explicit resolver command, the precise CSV column schema, and copy-ready response-format examples like '[PR] PRD' and 'bmad-prd'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is conveyed via phases, preceded-by/followed-by, required gates, and completion detection, but there is no explicit numbered procedure or validation checkpoint, so the workflow is present yet implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is well-organized into clear sections with no nested documentation references; its only path/command mentions are live project data sources, not files to chase. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |