Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable activation workflow with concrete commands and an explicit handoff, well-suited to a single-purpose forwarding shim. Its main weakness is redundancy — the customization field list and migration guidance are repeated — which inflates token cost without adding clarity.
Suggestions
Define the four legacy customization fields once and reference them by name in the notice and step 4 instead of re-enumerating them each time.
Add a brief verification that resolve_customization.py returned a value before emitting the deprecation notice and forwarding.
Consider shortening the deprecation notice by moving the full migration field list to a single canonical location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the legacy customization field list is enumerated three times (intro, deprecation notice, step 4) and the long notice restates migration guidance already implied, fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean score-4 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 1 gives a copy-paste command ('uv run .../resolve_customization.py --skill ... --key workflow'), step 2 names exact config files, step 3 supplies verbatim notice text, and step 4 specifies the exact intent, four legacy fields, and verbatim user input to forward — fully actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1–4 sequence with an explicit handoff checkpoint ('bmad-prd takes the workflow from here. Do not execute any further steps') is present, but there is no verification that step 1's customization resolution succeeded before proceeding, a minor validation gap that fits score 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle directories exist and the skill is under 50 lines with a single well-organized 'On Activation' section and no nested reference chains, so under the simple-skill exception progressive disclosure scores 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |