Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable forwarding shim with a clear step sequence and clean organization. Its main weakness is duplicated verbosity in the deprecation notice and customization field lists.
Suggestions
Dedupe the customization field list: state it once and reference it from the deprecation notice and step 4 instead of repeating it.
Add a brief error-recovery note for the resolve_customization.py and config-load steps (e.g. what to do if config.yaml is absent).
Specify the concrete mechanism for invoking bmad-prd (e.g. a literal activation call) so the forwarding step is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the deprecation notice and the step-4 customization field list are long and partially duplicated, which could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete executable command, specific file paths, and explicit context to forward (intent plus four pre-resolved fields), with only a minor gap in how to literally invoke bmad-prd. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 4-step sequence with an explicit termination guard; no error-recovery loop for the resolve/config steps keeps it just below 5, and it is not destructive so the cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, self-contained shim with clean heading and numbered structure and no nested references; under the simple-skill rule this is well-organized enough to score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |