Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, safety-conscious instruction skill: it names the exact MCP tools to call, sequences the discovery workflow, and states limitations and untrusted-content boundaries without padding. The main gaps are mild redundancy across sections and a few high-level directives ('refine or paginate') that would benefit from one concrete example.
Suggestions
Show one concrete example in Examples — e.g. a sample search_skills query term set for the React auth example and what a candidate comparison should look like.
Number the workflow steps and add an explicit stopping/refinement checkpoint (e.g. when search results are empty or off-target, try broader terms or paginate).
Consolidate the repeated do-not-execute/do-not-install guardrails so they appear once instead of in both Workflow and Limitations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows, and nearly every sentence carries an instruction. It falls just short of anchor 5 because of minor redundancy — e.g. the 'do not execute scripts / never execute them' guardrail appears in both Workflow and Limitations, and 'Do not change local files or install skills during discovery' overlaps the description's no-install framing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable MCP calls are named: 'Call search_skills with focused terms', 'read plausible candidates with get_skill(includeContent=true)', 'Read relevant support files with list_skill_files and read_skill_file'. It is not 5 because some guidance stays high-level — 'refine or paginate' gives no concrete example query terms or pagination parameters, and the Examples section says 'Follow the workflow above' rather than showing a sample search. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered sequence is present (search catalog → identify candidates → read with get_skill → read support files → explain results) with error-handling directives ('Return errors, unavailable resources and catalog gaps clearly') and the explicit-ack example anchoring behavior. It is anchor 4 rather than 5: steps are prose-packed rather than sequenced, and checkpoints like 'when to stop refining search terms' are implicit. No destructive/batch cap applies since discovery is read-only. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (none exist in the bundle), and the body is cleanly organized into When to Use, Workflow, Examples, and Limitations sections. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this earns anchor 5 ('well-organized sections' for a short single-purpose skill). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |