Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a serviceable overview with genuine safety guardrails and a clearly signaled deep-dive reference, but it reads largely as template boilerplate: repetitive trigger bullets, an implicit rather than ordered workflow, and an orphaned references/fontes.md that no file links to. Tightening the boilerplate and surfacing fontes.md would lift most dimensions.
Suggestions
Link references/fontes.md from the body (e.g., in a 'Fontes oficiais' section pointing to it for the source index) so the bundle file is discoverable.
Collapse the six 'When the user mentions...' bullets into one line listing the trigger terms, freeing tokens for a concrete example (e.g., citation format with URL/date).
Turn the implicit procedure into an ordered intake-then-verify-then-draft sequence with explicit checkpoints (identify case data -> check consolidated text/precedents -> draft with citation -> re-verify), mirroring the guide's steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Escopo e verificacao' paragraph is dense and earns its tokens, but the six near-identical 'When the user mentions X or related topics' bullets and the boilerplate Do-Not-Use/Limitations sections are padding that could be tightened to a line or two — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'. Not a 2 because the body is short and its core content is not padded. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body gives concrete intake directives ('identificar estado/municipio, foro, data dos fatos, rito, documentos e urgencia', 'citar URL, numero, data e limites da tese') but the actual procedure for researching, drafting, and verifying is deferred to the guide, and the body offers no examples — matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is only implicit in a paragraph, with guardrails present ('Nao calcular prazo final sem termo inicial', 'Nao protocolar... sem autorizacao especifica') but no ordered steps or explicit validation checkpoints in the body itself — matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill performs no batch or destructive operations. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | detailed-guide.md is clearly signaled (one level deep, with guidance to load relevant sections or read fully), but the bundle's second file, fontes.md, is never referenced from SKILL.md or the detailed guide, leaving 146 lines of source index unreachable. Scored against the actual bundle structure, this matches 'some structure but could be better organized' rather than the 'minor organization gaps' of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |