Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, actionable playbook with concrete tool sequences, parameters, and thoughtful safety guidance for non-atomic batch operations. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the Quick Reference table and Known Pitfalls repeat earlier sections, and the 'When to Use'/'Limitations' sections are boilerplate — and the absence of any external reference files for the tabular API material.
Suggestions
Cut the boilerplate 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' sections, whose content is either tautological ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') or already covered by 'Write boundaries'.
Deduplicate: keep either the per-workflow tool sequences or the Quick Reference table, and merge 'Known Pitfalls' into the per-workflow Pitfalls lists to eliminate restated facts like the GID-as-string note.
Add a concrete example of an ASANA_SUBMIT_PARALLEL_REQUESTS 'actions' payload (method, path, data) so the bulk workflow is fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — no time wasted explaining what Asana or MCP is — but the 20-row Quick Reference table duplicates the workflow sections, 'Known Pitfalls' restates earlier pitfalls ('All Asana IDs are strings' vs 'Task GIDs are returned as strings'), and the 'When to Use'/'Limitations' sections ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') are boilerplate padding. Not 4 because these redundant/padded sections are more than minor; not 2 because the core content is dense and useful. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool slugs (e.g. ASANA_CREATE_A_TASK), key parameters with formats ('due_on': Due date (YYYY-MM-DD)), ID-resolution recipes, and pagination handling give mostly executable guidance. Not 5 because the parallel-requests section ('Array of action objects with method, path, and data') gives no example action object and no call syntax is shown; not 3 because per-tool parameters and pitfalls are specific and directly usable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup is a clearly sequenced 4-step flow with an explicit checkpoint ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows'), and Write boundaries provides batch validation ('Preview bulk actions and record each result; parallel request batches are not atomic, so reconcile ambiguous failures'), so the batch-operation cap does not apply. Not 5 because the core task/project/section workflows lack per-step verification or feedback loops (e.g. confirm a created task exists before adding it to a section); not 3 because validation checkpoints are present for the riskiest operations. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the self-contained body is well organized into Prerequisites, Setup, Write boundaries, four Core Workflows, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, and Quick Reference — good structure with easy navigation. Not 5 because the 185-line body exceeds the simple-skill case and the inline Quick Reference table duplicates the workflow content that could live in a separate reference file; not 3 because there are no buried references and no wall-of-text sections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |