Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer
49
37%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-aws-cost-optimizer/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear domain (AWS cost optimization) and mentions specific tools, which is helpful for differentiation. However, it lacks a 'Use when...' clause, doesn't enumerate specific concrete actions, and misses common user trigger terms like 'billing', 'cloud spending', or 'savings plans'. It reads more like a title than a functional description that helps Claude select the right skill.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about AWS costs, cloud spending, billing analysis, savings plans, reserved instances, or cost reduction strategies.'
List specific concrete actions such as 'Analyzes AWS billing data, identifies unused resources, recommends rightsizing opportunities, evaluates Reserved Instance and Savings Plan coverage, and generates cost breakdowns by service or tag.'
Include natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'AWS bill', 'cloud spending', 'cost reduction', 'savings plans', 'reserved instances', and 'cost breakdown'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (AWS cost) and some actions ('cost analysis' and 'optimization recommendations'), and mentions specific tools (AWS CLI, Cost Explorer), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions like identifying unused resources, rightsizing instances, or analyzing billing breakdowns. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also not very detailed, warranting a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'AWS', 'cost', 'Cost Explorer', and 'AWS CLI' which users might mention, but misses common variations like 'cloud spending', 'billing', 'savings plans', 'reserved instances', 'cost reduction', or 'AWS bill'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of AWS cost analysis with specific tools (AWS CLI, Cost Explorer) provides some distinctiveness, but 'cost analysis and optimization' is broad enough that it could overlap with general AWS management skills or cloud infrastructure skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
42%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides genuinely useful, executable AWS CLI commands for cost analysis and optimization, which is its strongest aspect. However, it suffers from significant verbosity with sections that describe capabilities rather than instruct (Core Capabilities, Example Prompts, Best Practices), and it lacks proper validation/feedback loops for destructive operations like resource deletion. The monolithic structure with no external file references makes it token-inefficient.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically reduce 'Core Capabilities', 'Example Prompts', 'When to Use This Skill', and 'Best Practices' sections—these describe rather than instruct and waste tokens on things Claude already knows.
Add explicit validation steps before destructive operations: e.g., 'List unattached volumes → verify each is truly unused (check last attach time, tags) → confirm with user → delete with --dry-run first → then delete.'
Split the CLI command reference, checklist, and workflow into separate files (e.g., CLI_REFERENCE.md, CHECKLIST.md) and link from a concise SKILL.md overview.
Remove the 'Integration with Kiro CLI' and 'Additional Resources' sections as they add minimal actionable value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is excessively verbose with sections Claude doesn't need: 'When to Use This Skill', 'Example Prompts', 'Core Capabilities' bullet lists that merely describe what the skill does rather than instruct, 'Best Practices' that are generic advice Claude already knows, and 'Integration with Kiro CLI' that adds little value. The 'Additional Resources' section with URLs is also low-value filler. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The AWS CLI commands are concrete, executable, and copy-paste ready with proper flags, JMESPath queries, and date calculations. Commands cover cost analysis, unused resource detection, and rightsizing analysis with specific output formatting. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Optimization Workflow' provides a clear 4-step sequence, and the Safety Notes mention risk levels. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for destructive operations like deleting EBS volumes or snapshots—the workflow just says 'Delete unattached EBS volumes' without a verify-then-delete pattern. This should cap the score at 2 per the rubric's feedback loop requirement for destructive changes. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic wall of text with no references to external files. Everything is inline—the checklist, example prompts, best practices, CLI commands, and workflow could be split into separate reference files. At ~150+ lines, this would benefit significantly from progressive disclosure. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
431bfad
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.