Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, information-dense treatment of the status-bar pattern with concrete examples, a cost model, and explicit selection rules — but it monolithically keeps everything inline while pointing to companion code and book files that are not actually shipped in the skill bundle. Splitting the five-technique details and cost model into referenced files (or shipping the referenced paths) would complete the structure.
Suggestions
Ship or remove the dangling references: `chapter2/system-hint/` and `book/chapter2.md` do not exist in the skill bundle, so the 配套代码 and 深度阅读 sections point nowhere — either include them under references/ or drop/replace the pointers.
Move the per-technique details of 实践模式 4 (five status-bar techniques, ~8 lines each) into a separate reference file with one-line summaries in SKILL.md, keeping the main file at the decision level (position, composition, replace-vs-append, cost model).
Trim the introductory analogy and merge the overlapping attention-guidance bullets in 核心原则 with the corresponding 实践模式 sections to reclaim tokens without losing content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and almost every section carries non-obvious information (KV-cache invalidation mechanics, the replace-vs-append cost model, experiment numbers), not concepts Claude already knows. A few sections could be tightened — the phone analogy in the intro and some overlap between 核心原则 and 实践模式 — placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, usable guidance throughout: an exact messages-array layout showing injection position, the `<agent_status>` tag format, timestamp format `[2025-09-14 10:30:45]`, counter notation `Tool call #3 for 'read_file'`, a cost formula with an explicit decision rule, and runnable commands (`python main.py --mode preview`). Not 5 because full copy-paste implementation code is not inline — it is delegated to the companion code path. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 实践模式 section presents a coherent progression (injection position → composition → two update implementations with an explicit selection rule and cost model → five techniques → pitfalls), and 常见陷阱 gives error-avoidance checkpoints. This is guidance for design choices rather than a destructive/batch procedure, so the missing validate-step pattern does not cap it; minor gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and navigable, but it is fully self-contained with all ~107 lines inline and no bundle files shipped (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent). Its two cited paths — `chapter2/system-hint/` and `book/chapter2.md` — are dangling outside the skill bundle, so the 'deep reading' and 'companion code' pointers do not resolve within the skill. Anchor 3: structure exists, but references are neither present nor clearly navigable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |