Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, concrete checklist with before/after examples per rule and no concept padding. It is strong on actionability and organization; the main gains are a tighter detection-method line and an explicit per-rule application procedure.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the repeated "检测方法：LLM judge 语义判定（上线前须通过独立人工金标集校准）" line by stating it once in "使用方式" and referencing it per rule.
Add an explicit application workflow, e.g. "For each rule: scan text → if matched, rewrite using the rule's 改写建议 → re-check until clean".
Consider moving the per-rule 改写建议 or a fuller example set into a one-level reference file if the SKILL.md grows further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-dense with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor trim candidate is the identical "检测方法：LLM judge 语义判定..." line repeated across all 11 rules. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every rule pairs a concrete 坏例 with a concrete 好例 and a 改写建议, giving mostly executable guidance; it stops just short of fully copy-paste-ready patterns because it is judgment guidance rather than fixed commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "使用方式" directs iterating rule-by-rule ("逐条对照...自查"), an unambiguous single action with no destructive/batch ops to validate, but lacks an explicit per-rule check→rewrite checkpoint sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained, well-organized single file (no references/scripts/assets exist) with consistent sections per rule; it exceeds the simple-skill line count, so a one-level reference split could help but is not strictly needed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |