Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and gives concrete authoring directives with strong anti-pattern guidance. Its main gap is the absence of an explicitly sequenced authoring workflow with validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense: each bullet earns its place with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and directive (e.g., 'Start with an explicit ## SCOPE: activation conditions, allowed targets, and exclusions'; 'Define STOP conditions for missing prerequisites...'), with only minor gaps versus literal templates. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Patterns bullets give a rough sequence (SCOPE → workflow → STOP → canonical ref → focus) but the authoring process itself has no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Context, Patterns, Examples, Anti-Patterns), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |