Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and actionable, with concrete paths, a fallback command, and explicit anti-patterns; the only real gap is the absence of a validation/checkpoint step in the decision-recording and reviewer-reject flows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, providing concrete paths and a compact format template without restating known concepts; the brief Context paragraph on byte-count redundancy is the minor trimmable over-explanation keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance — the inbox path `.squad/decisions/inbox/{your-name}-{brief-slug}.md`, the fallback `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`, and a fill-in decision template — with only minor gaps from placeholder-based templates rather than fully copy-paste examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each pattern is clearly sequenced (e.g. decision recording: locate TEAM ROOT → write to inbox path → use the format) with explicit do/don't guardrails; not a 5 because no validation checkpoint is shown even for the write/reject flows. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external bundle files and no need for references, and is cleanly organized into Context, Patterns, and Anti-Patterns sections, so the simple-skill exception awards a 5 for well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |