Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill: concrete rules with actionable examples and a validation-aware sequence. Its only real weakness is mild redundancy between the Patterns and Anti-Patterns sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (e.g. 'Use generic/parameterized values', 'update your history.md'), but the Anti-Patterns section largely restates the Patterns, a minor instance of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates — 'use obviously-fake test fixtures (e.g., "test-agent-1", "TestBot")' and 'Run the test suite for files you touched' — with only minor generality in phrases like 'verify your changes don't break existing tests'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Peer Quality Check gives a clear before-finish sequence with a validation checkpoint ('Run the test suite for files you touched. If CI has been failing, check...'), leaving only minor gaps in explicit error-recovery feedback. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the well-organized Context / Patterns / Anti-Patterns sections satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |