Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured body whose commands, tables, and protocol steps are copy-paste ready. Its weaknesses are redundancy in the disambiguation messaging and inlining of manifest/config material that could be split into reference files.
Suggestions
State the disambiguation rule once (in the Disambiguation section) and have the Context callout point to it, cutting the duplicated framing and the cost-of-asking rhetoric.
Move the manifest JSON schema and squad.config.ts example into a references/ file (e.g., MANIFEST.md) linked from the Discovery section to slim the main body.
Add an explicit failure-recovery step to the Work Handoff Protocol (e.g., what to do when 'gh issue create' fails or the target squad's manifest cannot be read).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — tables, code blocks, and checklists carry the weight with no generic-concept explanations — but the core disambiguation rule is stated three times (Context callout, Default behaviour table, Anti-patterns) and rhetorical padding like 'The cost of asking is one ask_user. The cost of getting it wrong is the user has to redo the work' could be trimmed. This matches anchor 3: mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: copy-ready commands ('squad registry add platform-squad ../friend-platform', 'squad delegate platform-squad "Add Prometheus metrics endpoint..."'), a complete ask_user prompt block, manifest JSON, a squad.config.ts example, and a concrete issue-creation spec with title/label/body contents. This matches anchor 5: copy-paste ready commands covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Work Handoff Protocol is a clear numbered sequence (check manifest → create issue → track → poll) with an upfront validation checkpoint ('Verify the target squad accepts the work type') and a polling feedback loop. Minor gaps remain — no explicit error-recovery path if delegation or polling fails — matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-organized sections, and protocol detail is correctly delegated via a clearly signaled one-level reference to cross-squad-communication/SKILL.md ('This skill answers who — the companion answers how'). The manifest schema and config examples are inlined where they could live in reference files, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |