Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction set with strong validation emphasis and concrete test-file exemplars; its main gap is that guidance stays at the directive level without exact commands or an explicitly numbered workflow sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every directive earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and domain-specific ('Strict-compile the workflow and inspect the emitted artifact', 'Test a realistic mutation ... and prove the relevant gate fails') with real test-file examples, but it stops short of copy-paste commands, sitting at 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps' rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Validation is present and emphasized ('a zero exit code alone is not enough', 'Fail closed when ... unavailable', 'prove the relevant gate fails'), avoiding the destructive/batch cap, but the patterns are principles rather than an explicitly numbered sequence with checkpoints, fitting just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, requires no external bundle references (none provided), and is organized into clear Context / Patterns / Examples / Anti-Patterns sections, qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |