Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear workflows, concrete templates, and strong validation feedback loops. Its weaknesses are mild verbosity from cross-section restatement and a monolithic single-file structure that forgoes progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Trim overlap between the prose intro, Rules, and Anti-Patterns sections so each point appears once in its most authoritative location.
Consider splitting the spawn template or the good/bad examples into a referenced bundle file to reduce inline length and improve navigability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and protocol-focused without re-explaining basics, but the prose intro and the Anti-Patterns section restate points already covered by the template, checklist, and rules, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste spawn template with fill-in sections, a concrete `gh issue list --search` command, checkbox checklists, and contrasting good/bad examples — fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-cycle table sequences the process clearly, with explicit coordinator validation after each cycle and a retry-then-escalate feedback loop plus checklists for recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but is a single ~157-line monolithic file with no bundle references; the spawn template, checklists, and examples are inlined where a one-level split could aid navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |