Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable decision reference with clear sequencing and a built-in fallback loop, held back only by minor redundancy between the model tables/lists and the absence of any split-out reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and relies heavily on token-efficient tables; it assumes Claude's competence and does not explain basic concepts. Minor duplication (the 'Valid Models' list restates models already in the fallback chains and tables, and the role-table 'Why' column adds light rationale) keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready: specific model strings, an explicit spawn parameter block, a ready-to-use acknowledgment format, and worked examples covering common cases (backend dev, user override, complex refactor, scribe). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-layer hierarchy is explicitly sequenced ('Check these layers in order — first match wins') and the fallback chain forms a clear error-recovery loop (silent retry, max 3, then nuclear fallback) with explicit rules; this is not a destructive/batch operation so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained, which suits a single-file reference; sections are well organized (Context, Patterns, Examples, Anti-Patterns). Because it runs longer than 50 lines with inline reference lists (Valid Models, role mappings) that could optionally live in a separate file, it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |