Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and gives executable invocation guidance, but it lacks an explicit validation/safety workflow for its destructive operations. Adding a dry-run-then-confirm checkpoint would close the main gap.
Suggestions
Add a short workflow note: run with --dry-run first, review what would be pruned/archived, then run the real command — giving an explicit validation checkpoint for the destructive operations.
Briefly document what --deep and --dry-run do so the actionable guidance is complete rather than relying on flag names alone.
Clarify whether Claude should verify .squad/ size or history.md thresholds before invoking, turning the "When To Use" triggers into a check-then-act sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~25 lines) with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; each section (What It Does, When To Use, Invocation, Confidence) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for both surfaces ("squad nap", "squad nap --deep", "squad nap --dry-run" and the REPL equivalents), matching the executable-guidance anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Prune/archive/clean are destructive batch operations, yet no validation checkpoint or validate→fix→retry loop is described beyond listing a --dry-run flag, so workflow clarity is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and clearly organized sections, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |