CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pr-lifecycle

Complete issue → PR → merge lifecycle with readiness checks

55

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.copilot/skills/pr-lifecycle/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Context

This skill is the canonical Copilot-agent lifecycle for the Squad repository. It covers the full path from picking up a GitHub issue to merging a PR. Where older docs (templates, copilot-instructions, CONTRIBUTING.md) conflict with this skill, this skill takes precedence for Copilot agents.

For advanced scenarios (worktrees, multi-repo coordination), see .copilot/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md.

Scope

THIS SKILL COVERS:

  • Issue pickup and branch creation
  • Implementation, build, test, lint workflow
  • Pre-push safety verification
  • PR creation with correct target, title, body, and labels
  • All 11 PR readiness checks (what they check, how to pass, how to fix)
  • Post-creation maintenance (review feedback, rebasing, CI)
  • Merge preconditions and cleanup

THIS SKILL DOES NOT COVER:

  • Worktree-based parallel work (see git-workflow skill)
  • Multi-repo coordinated PRs (see git-workflow skill)
  • Release process / publishing (see .squad/skills/release-process)
  • Reviewer lockout protocol (see .copilot/skills/reviewer-protocol)
  • Architectural or security review checklists

Lifecycle Procedure

Phase 1 — Issue Pickup

  1. Read the issue. Understand the acceptance criteria before writing code.

  2. Confirm capability fit. Check your capability profile in .squad/team.md. 🟢 = proceed. 🟡 = proceed but flag in PR. 🔴 = comment on issue and stop.

  3. Branch from dev:

    git fetch origin dev
    git checkout dev
    git rebase origin/dev
    git checkout -b squad/{issue-number}-{slug}
    • Branch name format: squad/{issue-number}-{kebab-case-slug}
    • Example: squad/42-fix-login-validation
    • Never branch from main
  4. Mark in-progress (optional):

    gh issue edit {number} --add-label "status:in-progress"

Phase 2 — Implementation

  1. Make your changes. Follow the codebase conventions:

    • TypeScript strict mode, no @ts-ignore
    • ESM-only, async/await
    • JSDoc on new public APIs
  2. Build:

    npm run build
  3. Test:

    npm test
  4. Type check:

    npm run lint
  5. Stage specific files only:

    git add path/to/file1.ts path/to/file2.ts
    • NEVER git add ., git add -A, or git commit -a
    • ALWAYS name each file explicitly
  6. Pre-push safety check:

    # Verify file count matches intent (expect ≤10 files for most fixes)
    git diff --cached --stat
    
    # Verify NO unintended deletions
    git diff --cached --diff-filter=D --name-only

    If you see unexpected files or deletions, unstage them: git reset HEAD <file>

  7. Single commit with issue reference:

    git commit -m "Brief description of change
    
    Closes #{issue-number}
    
    Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>"
    • If you already have multiple commits, squash: git rebase -i origin/dev and squash all into one
    • Never use git reset --soft to squash — it picks up delta from dev and contaminates the commit
  8. Add changeset (if required): A changeset is required when your PR modifies files under packages/squad-sdk/src/ or packages/squad-cli/src/.

    npx changeset add

    This prompts for: which packages changed, bump type (patch/minor/major), summary.

    Or create manually at .changeset/{descriptive-name}.md:

    ---
    '@bradygaster/squad-cli': patch
    ---
    
    Brief description of the change

    If the changeset creates a second commit, squash it into your main commit.


Phase 3 — PR Creation

  1. Push:

    git push -u origin squad/{issue-number}-{slug}
  2. Create PR targeting dev:

    gh pr create --repo bradygaster/squad --base dev \
      --title "fix: brief description (#issue-number)" \
      --body "Closes #{issue-number}
    
    ## Summary
    What this PR does and why.
    
    ## Changes
    - File-level description of changes
    
    Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>"
  3. Title conventions:

    • Bug fix: fix: description (#N)
    • Feature: feat: description (#N)
    • Docs: docs: description (#N)
    • Chore/infra: chore: description (#N)
  4. Labels:

    • fix, feat, docs, or repo-health for type
    • squad:{agent-name} if working as a squad member
    • skip-changelog only with reviewer approval (escape hatch)
  5. Scope rules by label:

    • repo-health: Only modify .github/, scripts/, root config, tests, docs. Never modify packages/*/src/
    • fix or feat: May modify product source. Must include changeset when touching packages/*/src/

Phase 4 — PR Readiness

An automated readiness check runs on every push and posts a checklist comment on the PR. All 11 checks must pass before review (check 11 is informational-only).

Check 1: Single Commit

WhatPR must contain exactly 1 commit
PassPush a single, squashed commit
Fixgit rebase -i origin/dev → squash all commits into one → git push --force-with-lease
GotchaNever git reset --soft to squash — contaminates the commit with unrelated changes

Check 2: Not in Draft

WhatPR must not be marked as draft
PassCreate PR as ready, or convert: gh pr ready
Fixgh pr ready {number} or use the GitHub UI
GotchaThe readiness check still runs on drafts but will show ❌ until you mark ready

Check 3: Branch Up to Date

WhatPR branch must not be behind dev
PassRebase onto latest dev before pushing
Fixgit fetch origin dev && git rebase origin/dev && git push --force-with-lease
GotchaAfter rebasing, the readiness check re-runs automatically on the new push

Check 4: Copilot Review

WhatThe copilot-pull-request-reviewer bot must post an APPROVED review
PassWait — Copilot review is triggered automatically on PR creation/push
FixIf Copilot hasn't reviewed after 5 minutes, push an empty commit to re-trigger: git commit --allow-empty -m "trigger review" && git push then squash before merge
GotchaCopilot review state is APPROVED, CHANGES_REQUESTED, or COMMENTED. Only APPROVED passes

Check 5: Changeset Present

WhatPRs that modify packages/squad-sdk/src/ or packages/squad-cli/src/ must include a .changeset/*.md file or a CHANGELOG.md edit
PassRun npx changeset add and commit the generated file
Fixnpx changeset add → select affected package(s) → select bump type → write summary → git add .changeset/ && git commit --amend --no-edit && git push --force-with-lease
GotchaThe skip-changelog label bypasses this check but requires reviewer approval. Non-source changes (docs, config, tests) don't need a changeset

Check 6: No Merge Conflicts

WhatPR must be cleanly mergeable with the base branch
PassKeep branch rebased on dev
Fixgit fetch origin dev && git rebase origin/dev → resolve conflicts → git push --force-with-lease
GotchaGitHub may show null mergeability briefly while computing — the check treats this as passing

Check 7: Scope Clean

WhatWarns if PR includes .squad/ or docs/proposals/ files
PassDon't include team state or proposal files in product PRs
FixRemove unintended files: git reset HEAD .squad/ docs/proposals/ then amend your commit
GotchaThis check is informational only — it always passes but flags attention. Including these files is OK if intentional (e.g., updating agent history)

Check 8: Copilot Threads Resolved

WhatAll review threads opened by copilot-pull-request-reviewer must be resolved
PassAddress each Copilot comment, then click "Resolve conversation" in the GitHub UI
FixGo to the PR's "Files changed" tab → find unresolved Copilot threads → fix the code or explain why no change is needed → click "Resolve conversation"
GotchaOutdated threads (on code that's since changed) are automatically skipped. Only active, unresolved threads block

Check 9: CI Passing

WhatAll CI check runs (excluding the readiness check itself) must be green
PassFix any build, test, or lint failures and push
FixRead the failing check's logs (gh run view {run-id} --log-failed), fix the issue, push
GotchaPending/in-progress checks also show ❌. Wait for all checks to complete before evaluating. The readiness check re-runs after CI completes via workflow_run trigger

Check 10: Issue Linked

WhatPR body or commit message must reference an issue (Closes #N, Fixes #N, Resolves #N, or Part of #N)
PassInclude Closes #N in PR body or commit message
FixEdit PR body to add Closes #{issue-number}, or amend commit message
GotchaCase-insensitive matching. Only closing keywords are recognized

Check 11: Protected Files (informational)

WhatWarns when zero-dependency bootstrap files are modified (always passes)
PassAlways passes — this is informational only
FixIf flagged, verify the changed bootstrap file still has zero external dependencies
GotchaProtected files are listed in copilot-instructions.md. The check warns but does not block

Phase 5 — Post-Creation Maintenance

  1. Handling Copilot review feedback:

    • Read each comment carefully
    • Fix valid issues in your code
    • Resolve each thread after addressing it
    • Amend your single commit: git commit --amend --no-edit && git push --force-with-lease
  2. Rebasing when behind dev:

    git fetch origin dev
    git rebase origin/dev
    # Resolve any conflicts
    git push --force-with-lease
  3. Re-running CI:

    • CI re-runs automatically on every push
    • To re-run without changes: gh run rerun {run-id} --failed
  4. If readiness check is stale:

    • The readiness check re-runs on push and after CI completes
    • If it's stale, push a trivial fix or empty commit to re-trigger

Phase 6 — Merge & Cleanup

  1. Merge preconditions:

    • All 11 readiness checks pass (✅ across the board)
    • Human reviewer has approved (or maintainer merges directly)
    • No open blocking conversations
  2. Who merges:

    • Agents do not merge PRs themselves
    • Maintainers (bradygaster or designated reviewers) merge via GitHub UI
    • The repo uses squash merge, so commit history is clean regardless
  3. Post-merge cleanup:

    git checkout dev
    git pull origin dev
    git branch -d squad/{issue-number}-{slug}
    git push origin --delete squad/{issue-number}-{slug}
  4. Verify issue auto-close:

    • If PR body contains Closes #{N}, the issue closes automatically on merge
    • If not, manually close: gh issue close {number}

Examples

Example: Bug fix PR (no source changes)

# Branch
git fetch origin dev && git checkout dev && git rebase origin/dev
git checkout -b squad/610-fix-broken-link

# Fix
# ... edit docs/some-file.md ...

# Validate
npm run build && npm test

# Commit (no changeset needed — docs only)
git add docs/some-file.md
git diff --cached --stat        # verify: 1 file
git commit -m "docs: fix broken link in contributing guide

Closes #610

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>"

# Push and PR
git push -u origin squad/610-fix-broken-link
gh pr create --repo bradygaster/squad --base dev \
  --title "docs: fix broken link (#610)" \
  --body "Closes #610"

Example: SDK feature PR (source changes)

# Branch
git fetch origin dev && git checkout dev && git rebase origin/dev
git checkout -b squad/42-add-profile-api

# Implement
# ... edit packages/squad-sdk/src/profile/index.ts ...
# ... edit packages/squad-sdk/src/index.ts (re-export) ...

# Validate
npm run build && npm test && npm run lint

# Changeset (required — touches packages/squad-sdk/src/)
npx changeset add
# Select: @bradygaster/squad-sdk, minor, "Add profile API"

# Stage and commit
git add packages/squad-sdk/src/profile/index.ts packages/squad-sdk/src/index.ts .changeset/
git diff --cached --stat                    # verify file count
git diff --cached --diff-filter=D --name-only  # verify no deletions
git commit -m "feat: add profile API

Closes #42

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>"

# Push and PR
git push -u origin squad/42-add-profile-api
gh pr create --repo bradygaster/squad --base dev \
  --title "feat: add profile API (#42)" \
  --body "Closes #42

## Summary
Adds profile resolution API to the SDK.

## Changes
- New module: packages/squad-sdk/src/profile/
- Re-exported from barrel file"

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Branching from main (always branch from dev)
  • ❌ Targeting main with PRs (always target dev)
  • ❌ Using git add . or git add -A (stage specific files only)
  • ❌ Using git commit -a (same risk as broad staging)
  • ❌ Using git reset --soft to squash (contaminates commit with dev delta)
  • ❌ Force-pushing to dev or main (only force-push your own feature branch)
  • ❌ Merging your own PR (maintainers merge)
  • ❌ Skipping the changeset when source files changed (CI will fail)
  • ❌ Self-resolving Copilot threads without addressing the feedback
  • ❌ Pushing >1 commit without squashing (readiness check will flag it)
  • ❌ Including .squad/ files in product PRs without intention (scope check warns)
  • ❌ Mixing product and infrastructure changes in one PR (create separate PRs)

Readiness Check Gaps & Recommendations

After analyzing .github/workflows/squad-ci.yml, three gaps were identified. Gaps 1 and 3 are now implemented (checks 10 and 11). Gap 2 is deferred.

Gap 1: Issue Linkage Check (Check 10) — IMPLEMENTED

Problem: Nothing verifies that the PR body or commit message references an issue (Closes #N or Part of #N). Orphan PRs are hard to trace.

Recommendation: Add checkIssueLinkage(prBody, commitMessages) to pr-readiness.mjs.

/**
 * Check: Issue linkage.
 * @param {string} prBody — PR description text
 * @param {Array<{ commit: { message: string } }>} commits
 * @returns {{ pass: boolean, detail: string }}
 */
export function checkIssueLinkage(prBody, commits) {
  const issuePattern = /(closes|fixes|resolves|part of)\s+#\d+/i;
  const bodyHasRef = issuePattern.test(prBody || '');
  const commitHasRef = (commits || []).some(
    (c) => issuePattern.test(c.commit?.message || '')
  );
  if (bodyHasRef || commitHasRef) {
    return { pass: true, detail: 'Issue reference found' };
  }
  return {
    pass: false,
    detail: 'No issue reference — add `Closes #N` to PR body or commit message',
  };
}

Integration point: After check 2 (draft status), before check 3 (branch freshness). Data is already available from the commits and PR body fetched in the orchestrator.

Gap 2: No Required Checks Presence Verification

Problem: The CI status check (check 9) verifies that existing checks are green, but doesn't verify that the expected set of checks actually ran. If a workflow is misconfigured or skipped, the PR could pass with zero CI checks.

Recommendation: Add checkRequiredChecksPresent(checkRuns, files) to pr-readiness.mjs.

/** Minimum required check names that must appear for source PRs. */
export const REQUIRED_CHECKS = ['Squad CI / test'];

/**
 * Check: Required CI checks are present.
 * @param {Array<{ name: string }>} checkRuns
 * @param {Array<{ filename: string }>} files
 * @returns {{ pass: boolean, detail: string }}
 */
export function checkRequiredChecksPresent(checkRuns, files) {
  const touchesSource = (files || []).some(
    (f) => SOURCE_PATTERN.test(f.filename)
  );
  if (!touchesSource) {
    return { pass: true, detail: 'No source changes — required checks not enforced' };
  }
  const checkNames = new Set((checkRuns || []).map((cr) => cr.name));
  const missing = REQUIRED_CHECKS.filter((name) => !checkNames.has(name));
  if (missing.length > 0) {
    return {
      pass: false,
      detail: `Required check(s) not found: ${missing.join(', ')}`,
    };
  }
  return { pass: true, detail: 'All required checks present' };
}

Integration point: After check 9 (CI status). Uses the same checkRuns and files data already fetched.

Gap 3: Protected File Change Detection (Check 11) — IMPLEMENTED

Problem: The repo has zero-dependency bootstrap files that must never import external packages (documented in copilot-instructions.md). The squad-repo-health.yml workflow runs a bootstrap protection check, but the PR readiness comment doesn't surface it — contributors don't see the warning until they check the separate workflow.

Recommendation: Add checkProtectedFiles(files) to pr-readiness.mjs as an informational check (always passes, like scope clean).

/** Bootstrap files that must remain zero-dependency. */
export const PROTECTED_FILES = [
  'packages/squad-cli/src/cli/core/detect-squad-dir.ts',
  'packages/squad-cli/src/cli/core/errors.ts',
  'packages/squad-cli/src/cli/core/gh-cli.ts',
  'packages/squad-cli/src/cli/core/output.ts',
  'packages/squad-cli/src/cli/core/history-split.ts',
];

/**
 * Check: Protected file changes (informational).
 * @param {Array<{ filename: string }>} files
 * @returns {{ pass: boolean, detail: string }}
 */
export function checkProtectedFiles(files) {
  const touched = (files || []).filter(
    (f) => PROTECTED_FILES.includes(f.filename)
  );
  if (touched.length === 0) {
    return { pass: true, detail: 'No protected bootstrap files changed' };
  }
  return {
    pass: true,
    detail: `⚠️ ${touched.length} protected bootstrap file(s) changed: ${touched.map((f) => f.filename.split('/').pop()).join(', ')} — verify zero-dependency constraint`,
  };
}

Integration point: After check 7 (scope clean). Uses the same files data. Informational only — warns but doesn't block.

Summary of Recommended Changes

CheckTypeBlocks PR?Status
Issue linkage (Check 10)Hard gateYesImplemented
Required checks presentHard gateYesDeferred
Protected file warning (Check 11)InformationalNoImplemented

All three use data that pr-readiness.mjs already fetches — no new API calls needed. Total addition: ~60 lines of check functions + ~10 lines of orchestration wiring.

Repository
bradygaster/squad
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.