Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean guardrail skill: authoritative path table, unambiguous rules with allowlisted modules, concrete anti-patterns, and a clear procedure for extending the protected list. The only minor gap is that the new-utility workflow doesn't explicitly close the loop by running the regression test it prescribes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a five-row path table, terse ❌/✅ rules, a short anti-pattern list, and a three-step procedure, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section carries unique, load-bearing information — fits anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete: exact file paths, exact prohibitions ('NEVER add `import` or `require` statements referencing packages outside `node:*`'), an enumerated allowlist of built-in modules, and a named test file ('detect-squad-dir-zero-deps.test.ts') as a copyable pattern. For an instruction-only rule skill this is copy-paste-ready guidance — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding New Bootstrap Utilities' sequence is clearly numbered and the batch-operation risk (sweeping refactors) has an explicit validation checkpoint ('DO check this list before sweeping refactors' plus regression tests), so the missing-validation cap does not apply. Not 5 because the new-utility workflow stops at 'write a matching regression test' without a step to run it and confirm it passes — anchor 4 ('clear sequence, minor validation gaps'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~45-line body needs none; sections are well-organized and non-overlapping, with a single one-level reference to a test file in the repo. Per the simple-skill scoring note, well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |