Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a thorough, highly actionable reference with executable YAML, a sequenced workflow including validation and test steps, and a properly signaled bundle reference. Its main weakness is volume: substantial reference content and multiple full examples are inlined in SKILL.md that could be delegated to bundle files to better honor progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the three complete worked examples (Task Tracker, Reading List, Daily Notes) into a separate references/examples.md file and keep only one compact representative example inline, with a pointer to the rest.
Consider splitting the file properties table and the per-view-type examples into the bundle, leaving SKILL.md as a tighter overview that points to references/FUNCTIONS_REFERENCE.md and a new references/ for properties/views.
Tighten the workflow's validation step into an explicit inline fix-retry loop (e.g. 'If validation finds issues, fix them and re-validate before proceeding') rather than a forward reference to the Troubleshooting section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense reference material that assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what YAML or Obsidian is) and delegates the full function reference to the bundle file, but the large inlined set of three complete worked examples plus per-view-type examples could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | YAML throughout is copy-paste ready — a full schema block, every filter operator, formula patterns, and three complete working .base files (task tracker, reading list, daily notes) covering the common cases, matching the top anchor for fully executable examples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence includes an explicit Validate step ('Verify the file is valid YAML... Check that all referenced properties and formulas exist') and a Test step with an error-recovery pointer, but the feedback loop is a forward reference to a later section rather than a tight inline fix-retry loop, fitting the anchor for clear sequence with minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with a clearly signaled one-level-deep bundle reference ('see [FUNCTIONS_REFERENCE.md](references/FUNCTIONS_REFERENCE.md)') that exists on disk, but much reference material (file properties table, all view types, summary formulas, full examples) remains inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out, fitting the anchor for good structure with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |