Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, executable, and appropriately concise for a single-purpose skill. The main improvement is adding an explicit validation/retry loop for cases where scripted actions mutate the page.
Suggestions
Add a small validation/retry step in the Core Workflow (e.g. re-check page.url() or expected state after a mutation) to form an explicit feedback loop.
Merge or trim the redundant opening line and the overlap between 'Core Workflow' and 'Useful Commands' to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; minor redundancy such as the opening line restating the description and 'Useful Commands' overlapping 'Core Workflow' could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready, executable commands are given throughout (version check, session new, url/title, accessibility snapshot, row enumeration, hover popups, page.evaluate), covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Quick Start and Core Workflow sequence with a connection/tab confirmation checkpoint; no explicit validate->fix->retry loop, but the skill defaults to read-only inspection and requires announcing destructive actions. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files needed, with well-organized sections and a single one-level-deep pointer to the external docs URL. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |