Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete commands and examples, but it is verbose, lacks validation/retry checkpoints in the workflow, and contains a dangling template reference. Tightening the examples and adding an explicit verify-or-retry step would raise the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Condense the two large JSON examples into one canonical example plus a shorter variant, or move detailed schemas into a separate references file to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validation/retry checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., verify the prompt-file JSON is valid before running, and re-run with an adjusted prompt if generation fails or output is missing).
Fix or remove the dangling reference to templates/doraemon.md, which does not exist in the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two large, conceptually overlapping JSON examples (~50 lines of detailed fields each) plus mildly redundant notes ("JSON format ensures structured, parsable prompts") make the body noticeably heavier than needed; could be tightened without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands with all parameters documented and complete JSON prompt examples covering both the no-reference and reference-image cases; minor example filename inconsistency does not undermine executability. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced (understand → create prompt → execute → output handling) but lack validation checkpoints and an explicit error/retry loop despite the skill noting iterative refinement is normal, matching the anchor-3 validation-gap case. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable and references are signaled one level deep, but the referenced templates/doraemon.md does not exist in the bundle and the verbose JSON examples are inlined rather than split out, leaving organization with clear gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |