Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient instruction-only skill with concrete examples, clear branching between the skills-available and no-skills cases, and an excellent good/bad reveal contrast. The one real gap is that the pivotal 'combine outputs' step receives the least concrete guidance in the entire workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section carries guidance. Minor redundancy between the 'Creative combination principles' and 'Theme ideas' bullet lists keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete for an instruction-only skill: select '1 to 3' skills, specific juxtaposition examples, three enumerated fallback options, and copy-paste reveal phrasing with a good/bad contrast. The pivotal step 'Combine outputs into one cohesive deliverable' — the hardest part — stays high-level with no examples, so it falls short of anchor 5's fully executable coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps (discover, plan, fallback, execute, reveal) cover both the with-skills and no-skills branches unambiguously. There is no check that the produced artifact actually renders or works before reveal — a minor validation gap that fits anchor 4 rather than 5; no destructive or batch operations apply, so no cap is triggered. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is roughly 50 lines, well-organized under clear section headers, and needs no external references for this meta-skill; nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. Per the rubric guideline, an under-50-line skill with no need for references and well-organized sections scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |