Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The workflow itself is a model of clarity — five well-sequenced phases with genuine validation and error-recovery loops, a copy-paste search command, and a complete subagent prompt template. The bundle doesn't back it up, though: all three template files that Phase 4 depends on for citation rules and report structure are missing, and the body duplicates guidance between the Notes section and the phase instructions.
Suggestions
Ship the three referenced template files (templates/apa.md, templates/ieee.md, templates/bibtex.md) containing the citation rules and report structure, or inline the citation formats into SKILL.md if external files are not intended.
De-duplicate the Notes section: the subagent prefix-parsing note and the "synthesis, not listing" note repeat Phase 3 and Phase 4 guidance verbatim — keep them in one place.
Use bundle-relative paths (e.g. scripts/arxiv_search.py, templates/apa.md) instead of the absolute /mnt/skills/public/... mount path so references resolve regardless of where the skill is deployed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is skill-specific and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it could be tightened: the Notes section repeats the subagent prefix-parsing and "synthesis, not listing" guidance nearly verbatim from Phases 3–4, and Examples 1–2 restate the full phase instructions. This duplication goes beyond the "minor" trimming of the 4 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The bash invocation with flags, the JSON output field list, and the complete copy-paste subagent prompt are concrete, but Phase 4's core instruction — "Read only the template file that matches the user's requested format" — points at templates/apa.md, templates/ieee.md, and templates/bibtex.md, none of which exist in the bundle. The citation rules and report structure those files should supply are key missing details. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation and error-recovery loops: script failure handling ("tell the user which error and stop. Do not try to fabricate"), per-batch failure continuation ("log it, note which papers were affected, and continue"), coverage validation before synthesis, and an explicit fallback when themes can't be supported. This matches the top anchor for a batch workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The reference design is right — one-level-deep, well-signaled, "read only the template file that matches" — but scored against the actual bundle, all three referenced template files are missing while only scripts/arxiv_search.py exists. Following the navigation breaks at its most load-bearing link, which is more than the minor organization gap of the 4 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |