Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-organized into a clear workflow with genuine supporting reference files, but it lands at mid-level across all dimensions: an inlined template and generic principles dilute conciseness, guidance relies on placeholders, the workflow lacks validation checkpoints, and one referenced template file is missing.
Suggestions
Move the inlined scenes.md scaffold into the referenced templates/scenes-template.md (and create that file), keeping only a brief pointer plus field descriptions inline to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Trim the '3b1b Style Principles' to the non-obvious specifics Claude wouldn't already infer, removing truisms like 'Show, don't just tell' and 'Pause for insight'.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow, e.g., confirm audience/scope answers with the user before drafting scenes.md, and verify the draft covers the identified 'aha moment' and misconceptions before finalizing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and well-structured, but it inlines a ~55-line scenes.md template that should live in the referenced template file, and the '3b1b Style Principles' restate generic pedagogical truisms ('Show, don't just tell', 'Pause for insight') Claude already knows. This is 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' (score 2), not the verbose concept-explaining score-1 nor the lean score-3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete output scaffold and specific clarifying question sets, but much of the guidance relies on placeholders ('[Video Title]', '[X minutes]') and abstract directives ('Find the aha moment'). This matches the score-2 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than fully copy-paste-ready score-3 or vaguely-abstract score-1. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three phases (Understand → Clarify → Create) are clearly sequenced, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g., confirm scope with the user before drafting, verify the plan covers all key insights). This matches the score-2 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor, not the score-3 explicit-validation level. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References (narrative-patterns.md, visual-techniques.md, scene-examples.md) are present, real, and one level deep, but the body inlines the full scenes.md template that should be a separate file, and the referenced templates/scenes-template.md does not exist. This matches the score-2 'content that should be separate is inline' / organization-could-improve anchor, not the clean score-3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |