Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, highly actionable skill body with executable commands and concrete worked examples. The only gap is the absence of an explicit verification/feedback step after persisting a learning, which is worth adding given the mutating nature of the operation.
Suggestions
Add a post-save verification step, e.g. running `caliber learn list` or echoing back the saved learning, so Claude can confirm the write actually persisted (closes the workflow_clarity feedback-loop gap for a mutating operation).
Clarify error handling when `caliber learn add` fails (e.g., the learnings file is missing or the command errors) so Claude knows whether to retry, abort, or inform the user.
Make the confirmation gate's failure path explicit — state what to do if the user declines (e.g., 'If declined, do nothing and acknowledge') so the workflow is fully symmetric.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a tight numbered process, type prefixes, and worked examples with no explanatory padding of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (caliber learn add, git add CALIBER_LEARNINGS.md) and concrete copy-paste-ready examples, matching anchor 3 rather than pseudocode or vague description. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced with a confirmation checkpoint before the mutating add, but a persist/write operation lacks an explicit post-action verification or feedback loop, so it sits at anchor 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced; for a simple skill the well-organized Instructions / Examples / When NOT to trigger sections are sufficient to reach anchor 3 under the simple-skills guideline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |