Add a new deterministic scoring check in src/scoring/checks/ that evaluates config quality. Follows the Check[] return pattern, uses point constants from src/scoring/constants.ts, and integrates via filterChecksForTarget() in src/scoring/index.ts. Use when user says 'add scoring check', 'new check', 'modify scoring criteria', or works in src/scoring/checks/. Do NOT use for display changes or refactoring scoring logic.
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
The canonical home for this skill is scoring-checks in caliber-ai-org/ai-setup
Add a new deterministic check that evaluates a single aspect of AI agent config quality. All checks must be filesystem-based with no network calls or LLM inference.
earnedPoints and maxPoints must reference POINTS_* from src/scoring/constants.ts. Do NOT hardcode numbers.Check[] array: Export a function check<Category>(dir: string): Check[] where category is one of: existence, quality, grounding, accuracy, freshness, bonus.id (kebab-case, unique), name, category, maxPoints, earnedPoints, passed, detail, and optional suggestion/fix.action (string describing what to do), data (context for the fix), instruction (user-facing guidance).allChecks array in computeLocalScore().*_ONLY_CHECKS set in constants.ts.Verify before proceeding: Is your check measurable with a numeric point value?
Add constants below the appropriate category section (existence, quality, grounding, accuracy, freshness, bonus):
// In the appropriate CATEGORY section, e.g., Quality checks (25 pts):
export const POINTS_YOUR_CHECK_NAME = 4; // 1-12 pts typical
// If threshold-based, add a companion array:
export const YOUR_THRESHOLD_ARRAY = [
{ minValue: 10, points: 4 },
{ minValue: 5, points: 2 },
] as const;Check existing patterns: Token budgets use TOKEN_BUDGET_THRESHOLDS, code blocks use CODE_BLOCK_THRESHOLDS, concreteness uses CONCRETENESS_THRESHOLDS.
Verify: Review CATEGORY_MAX object to ensure your check fits within its category's point budget.
Choose the file based on category. Each file exports a check<Name>(dir: string): Check[] function:
existence.ts — files/directories exist (CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, skills, MCP servers)quality.ts — config structure, size, clarity (code blocks, token budget, concreteness, duplicates)grounding.ts — references to actual project files/directory structureaccuracy.ts — validity of references, git-based config driftfreshness.ts — git commit-based staleness, secrets, permissionsbonus.ts — hooks, learned content, OpenSkills formatsources.ts — source configuration and usageCreate the function following this structure:
import type { Check } from '../index.js';
import {
POINTS_YOUR_CHECK,
YOUR_THRESHOLD_ARRAY,
} from '../constants.js';
import { readFileOrNull } from '../utils.js'; // or other helpers
export function checkYourCategory(dir: string): Check[] {
const checks: Check[] = [];
// 1. Measure something concrete
const yourMetric = /* e.g., countFiles(), validatePaths(), etc. */;
const threshold = YOUR_THRESHOLD_ARRAY.find(t => yourMetric >= t.minValue);
const earnedPts = threshold?.points ?? 0;
checks.push({
id: 'your_unique_check_id',
name: 'Human-readable check name',
category: 'quality', // matches function context
maxPoints: POINTS_YOUR_CHECK,
earnedPoints: earnedPts,
passed: earnedPts >= Math.ceil(POINTS_YOUR_CHECK * 0.6), // or custom logic
detail: `${earnedPts}/${POINTS_YOUR_CHECK} points — ${yourMetric} items found`,
suggestion: earnedPts >= POINTS_YOUR_CHECK ? undefined : 'Action to improve',
fix: earnedPts >= POINTS_YOUR_CHECK ? undefined : {
action: 'verb_noun', // e.g., 'add_code_blocks', 'fix_references'
data: { currentValue: yourMetric, targetValue: 10 },
instruction: 'Specific, actionable guidance for the user.',
},
});
return checks;
}Verify ID uniqueness: Run grep -r "'your_unique_check_id'" src/scoring/checks/ — should return only your new check.
If your check only applies to certain agents (Claude, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot), register it in src/scoring/constants.ts:
// Add to the appropriate set:
export const CLAUDE_ONLY_CHECKS = new Set([
'claude_md_exists',
'your_new_check_id', // ← add here
'claude_rules_exist',
]);Available sets (update exactly one if applicable):
CLAUDE_ONLY_CHECKS — Claude Code targetsCURSOR_ONLY_CHECKS — Cursor targetsCODEX_ONLY_CHECKS — Codex/OpenCode targetsCOPILOT_ONLY_CHECKS — GitHub Copilot targetsBOTH_ONLY_CHECKS — Both Claude AND Cursor (cross-platform parity)NON_CODEX_CHECKS — Everything except Codex/OpenCodeCLAUDE_OR_CODEX_CHECKS — Claude OR CodexVerify filtering: Examine filterChecksForTarget() in src/scoring/index.ts to ensure your category will work correctly for your target agents.
Import your function at the top:
import { checkYourCategory } from './checks/your-file.js';Add to computeLocalScore() inside the allChecks array initialization:
export function computeLocalScore(dir: string, targetAgent?: TargetAgent): ScoreResult {
const target = targetAgent ?? detectTargetAgent(dir);
const allChecks: Check[] = [
...checkExistence(dir),
...checkQuality(dir),
...checkGrounding(dir),
...checkAccuracy(dir),
...checkYourCategory(dir), // ← ADD HERE IN ORDER
...checkFreshness(dir),
...checkBonus(dir),
...checkSources(dir),
];
// ... rest of function
}Verify registration: Run npm test src/scoring/__tests__/accuracy.test.ts (or similar) — all existing tests should still pass.
Create or edit src/scoring/checks/__tests__/your-file.test.ts:
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { mkdtempSync, writeFileSync, rmSync } from 'fs';
import { join } from 'path';
import { checkYourCategory } from '../your-file.js';
import { POINTS_YOUR_CHECK } from '../../constants.js';
describe('checkYourCategory', () => {
it('awards full points when condition passes', () => {
const dir = mkdtempSync('test-scoring-');
try {
// Set up the passing condition
writeFileSync(join(dir, 'SOME_FILE.md'), 'content that satisfies check');
const checks = checkYourCategory(dir);
const check = checks.find(c => c.id === 'your_unique_check_id');
expect(check).toBeDefined();
expect(check?.passed).toBe(true);
expect(check?.earnedPoints).toBe(POINTS_YOUR_CHECK);
} finally {
rmSync(dir, { recursive: true });
}
});
it('awards zero points when condition fails', () => {
const dir = mkdtempSync('test-scoring-');
try {
// Don't create the required condition
const checks = checkYourCategory(dir);
const check = checks.find(c => c.id === 'your_unique_check_id');
expect(check?.passed).toBe(false);
expect(check?.earnedPoints).toBe(0);
} finally {
rmSync(dir, { recursive: true });
}
});
it('returns correct detail message', () => {
const dir = mkdtempSync('test-scoring-');
try {
const checks = checkYourCategory(dir);
const check = checks.find(c => c.id === 'your_unique_check_id');
expect(check?.detail).toBeTruthy();
} finally {
rmSync(dir, { recursive: true });
}
});
});Run tests: npm test src/scoring/checks/__tests__/your-file.test.ts. All must pass before shipping.
Trigger: User says "Add a check to verify .claude/rules/ directory exists."
Actions:
export const POINTS_CLAUDE_RULES = 3; to constants.tsexistsSync(join(dir, '.claude', 'rules')) → true/false...checkExistence(dir) (already done)Result: Check id: 'claude_rules_exist' returns earnedPoints: 3, passed: true when dir exists.
Trigger: User says "Verify config has at least 3 code blocks with executable commands."
Actions:
export const CODE_BLOCK_THRESHOLDS = [
{ minBlocks: 3, points: 8 },
{ minBlocks: 2, points: 6 },
{ minBlocks: 1, points: 3 },
] as const;Result: 3+ blocks = 8 pts, 2 blocks = 6 pts, 1 block = 3 pts, 0 blocks = 0 pts.
Trigger: User says "Check that all file paths mentioned in config actually exist."
Actions:
export const POINTS_REFERENCES_VALID = 8; to constants.tsexistsSync(join(dir, path))valid / totalMath.round(ratio * POINTS_REFERENCES_VALID)Result: 80% valid refs = ~6 pts; 100% valid = 8 pts; 0% valid = 0 pts.
Issue: "My check doesn't appear in the score report."
Fix: 1) Verify ID in *_ONLY_CHECKS if platform-specific. 2) Verify import and spread in index.ts allChecks array. 3) Run npm test to ensure no tsc errors. 4) Check detectTargetAgent() returns your target platform.
Issue: "Points are hardcoded but should use constants."
Fix: Replace all literal numbers like earnedPoints: 5 with earnedPoints: POINTS_YOUR_CHECK. Constants are in src/scoring/constants.ts — use them consistently.
Issue: "Check makes an API call or network request."
Fix: Scoring MUST be deterministic and offline. Use only: fs module (readFileSync, existsSync, readdirSync), path, execSync for git commands. No HTTP, no LLM calls, no external services.
Issue: "Platform-specific check appears for the wrong agent."
Fix: 1) Verify check ID is in correct *_ONLY_CHECKS set. 2) Double-check filterChecksForTarget() handles your platform set. 3) Test with detectTargetAgent() on a real project.
Issue: "Test fails with 'Module not found' error."
Fix: Ensure file is in src/scoring/checks/ (not nested). Use .js extension in imports (TypeScript transpiles to ES modules). Run npm run build to check for tsc errors.
Issue: "Detail message is confusing or too technical."
Fix: Use friendly language: 3 code blocks found (need 3 for full points) instead of codeBlockCount=3. Make it clear WHY they got/lost points.
Issue: "Threshold-based check gives wrong points for edge cases."
Fix: Test all boundaries: value=0, value=threshold, value>>threshold. Use .find() to match highest-to-lowest: find(t => value >= t.minValue).
Issue: "Two checks have the same ID."
Fix: Run grep -r "'my_id'" src/scoring/checks/ to find duplicates. IDs must be globally unique across all check files. Use descriptive names like claude_md_exists, not check_1.
7950921
Canonical home
since Jul 28, 2026
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.