Conciseness

Mostly actionable templates rather than concept explanation, but it could be tightened — repeated 'Verify:'/'Check existing patterns:' asides and a lengthy Common Issues section pad the body beyond what each token strictly earns.

Actionability

Provides complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript check/test templates with concrete commands (`npm test ...`, `grep -r ...`) and clear placeholder substitution, fully executable once identifiers are filled in.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–5 are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints ('Verify ID uniqueness', 'Verify registration', 'Run tests... All must pass before shipping') and feedback loops for error recovery.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into sections but monolithic — ~275 lines all inline with no bundle/reference files, and content like the Examples and Common Issues sections could be split into separate references rather than living in the overview.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Add a new deterministic scoring check', 'Follows the Check[] return pattern', 'uses point constants from src/scoring/constants.ts', and 'integrates via filterChecksForTarget()' — rather than vague language.

Completeness

Explicitly answers what (add a deterministic scoring check using the Check[] pattern and constants) and when ('Use when user says...'), with explicit trigger guidance.

Trigger Term Quality

Provides natural user phrasings — 'add scoring check', 'new check', 'modify scoring criteria', plus 'works in src/scoring/checks/' — that a user would realistically say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (deterministic scoring checks) with distinct triggers and explicit negative scoping ('Do NOT use for display changes or refactoring scoring logic'), minimizing conflict with adjacent skills.