Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured, concise, and actionable with explicit per-step validation criteria and a concrete report template. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the referenced checks.md file is missing, leaving the core check content inaccessible.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced checks.md (containing the common and Feature Freeze checks) alongside SKILL.md so the deferred core content actually exists.
Consider moving the long report template into a reference file (e.g. references/report-template.md) and keeping only the field summary inline, to tighten the overview further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of what an FFe or Launchpad is); the report template is long but is the actual output spec, with only minor spots that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands (pull-lp-source, dget, seeded-in-ubuntu, rmadison) and an explicit PASS/FAIL/N/A report template give mostly copy-paste-ready guidance, with minor gaps deferred to checks.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence where each step ends with an explicit *Criterion:* validation checkpoint plus a report checklist; no retry/feedback loop, but none is required for a non-destructive review task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well sectioned and clearly signals checks.md one level deep, but checks.md is absent from the bundle (no references/scripts/assets and no checks.md at root), so navigation to the core check content is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |