Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable code, clear sequencing, validation, and feedback loops, but it is monolithic — all detail lives inline with no bundle files — and it includes some generic C++ convention explanation Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the 'Coding Conventions' examples that restate generic C++23 knowledge (auto, trailing returns, designated initializers, std::ranges), keeping only project-specific conventions.
Move the 'Advanced Patterns' and 'Common Patterns Reference' sections into a bundled reference file (e.g., references/advanced-patterns.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient project-specific macro usage (SET_MEMB, SET_FX, LUNA_DOC) that earns its place, but the 'Coding Conventions' section demonstrates generic C++23 concepts Claude already knows (auto, trailing return types, designated initializers, std::ranges). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable code using real project macros, exact file paths, and runnable build/test commands ('cmake --build --preset linux-full …', 'cata_test-tiles "[lua]"'), making it copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered Step 1–5 sequence is paired with an explicit 'Build and Verify' validation section, Troubleshooting issue→fix feedback loops, and a 'Files to Modify' checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers and a dedicated 'Reference Files' list are well organized, but no bundle files exist and ~370 lines are entirely inline, with substantial Advanced and Common Patterns that could be split into separate reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |