Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally lean, executable workflow with concrete commands and validation steps organized into clear sections; its only gap is the validation step being a flat list rather than an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or basic-concept explanation; every line is task-specific (exact rg commands, pgettext/translate_marker_context snippets, validation commands), assuming Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready rg/grep commands, exact pgettext/translate_marker_context/JSON ctxt snippets, and concrete validation commands (extract_json_strings.py, msgfmt, check_po_printf_format.py, lint-json.sh) cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (find shared msgids, split at source, update PO, validate) with explicit validation steps and a destructive-change gate, but the validation block is a flat command list rather than an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop with pass/fail branches. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill under 50 lines with clear sections (Hard requirements, Workflow, PR references); the simple-skill exception applies and no external file references are needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |