Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable orchestration spec with a clearly sequenced wave loop, explicit failure handling, and resume support — its main weaknesses are redundancy (barrier skills and routing specified multiple times) and a fully monolithic structure with no reference files despite its length.
Suggestions
Deduplicate: define the barrier-skill set once (e.g. in BARRIER_SKILLS) and derive the Barrier Skills table and [B] chain markers from it, rather than listing them three times.
Move the action/object/style enums, the chain-definitions table, and the 40-item skill inventory into references files (e.g. references/chain-map.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled links.
Specify the undefined pieces the loop depends on: the complexity-assessment criteria (what makes a feature 'low' vs 'high'), the readCSV helper, and how WAVE_INSTRUCTION placeholders are bound per row.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~675-line body avoids explaining known concepts, but barrier skills are enumerated three times (Barrier Skills table, [B] markers in Chain Definitions, and the BARRIER_SKILLS set), routing appears as both the detectTaskType code and the chain-definitions table, and a 40-item skill inventory is inlined — mostly efficient but with clear tightening opportunities, fitting anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Near copy-paste ready: concrete spawn_agents_on_csv invocation with parameters, wave CSV writing code, exact instruction template with report JSON, and CSV schemas. Minor gaps — readCSV, the complexity-assessment criteria, and WAVE_INSTRUCTION binding are referenced but undefined — keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The wave loop is fully sequenced with explicit checkpoints (read results, abort on failure, error table E001–E005 with recovery actions, E004 retry-once, --continue resume), satisfying batch-operation validation. The undefined complexity-assessment step feeding feature (low)/(high) chain selection is a minor gap, so anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content — action/object/style enums, chain-definition tables, skill inventory, barrier analysis code, CSV schemas — is inlined in a single 675-line file. Section headers make it navigable (not anchor 2), but content that clearly belongs in reference files is inline with zero external references, fitting anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |