Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured router skill with strong actionability and clear workflow sequencing. The routing logic, interactive question flows, and configuration tables are concrete and executable. The main weakness is verbosity — the ASCII diagram, full AskUserQuestion JSON blocks, and bilingual descriptions inflate the token cost, and the lack of verifiable bundle files makes it hard to fully credit progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Trim the ASCII architecture diagram to a simple bullet list of routes; the routing table already conveys the same information more precisely.
Consider summarizing the AskUserQuestion payloads more concisely (e.g., as a table of question→options→route) rather than showing full JSON structures inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ASCII architecture diagram and the interactive Q&A blocks with full AskUserQuestion JSON payloads add significant bulk. The routing table and auto-route rules are useful but the bilingual labels and repeated option descriptions could be tightened. Some content (e.g., explaining what CLAUDE.md is in option descriptions) is unnecessary for Claude. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete routing rules with priority order, specific AskUserQuestion payloads with exact parameter structures, direct dispatch examples with input→output mappings, and precise configuration tables for tool fallback, parameters, and batching thresholds. Everything is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step flow (Parse → Interactive Assessment → Execute) is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points and branching logic. Error handling is tabulated with resolutions. Each routing path has clear validation (ambiguous input falls to interactive, missing path triggers Q3). The skill correctly delegates execution validation to phase docs. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references 5 phase documents with clear links and purpose descriptions, which is good progressive disclosure design. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references exist. The SKILL.md itself is quite long (~180 lines) with the full interactive flow inline rather than summarized, and the architecture diagram could be omitted or simplified. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |